Sunday, April 7, 2013

Risk for Obama in pursuing morning-after pill case

WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Barack Obama supports requiring girls younger than 17 to see a doctor before buying the morning-after pill. But fighting that battle in court comes with its own set of risks.

A federal judge in New York on Friday ordered the Food and Drug Administration to lift age restrictions on the sale of emergency contraception, ending the requirement that buyers show proof they're 17 or older if they want to buy it without a prescription.

The ruling accused the Obama administration in no uncertain terms of letting the president's pending re-election cloud its judgment when it set the age limits in 2011.

"The motivation for the secretary's action was obviously political," U.S. District Judge Edward Korman wrote in reference to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who made the 2011 decision.

The FDA had been poised to allow over-the-counter sales with no age limits when Sebelius took the unprecedented step of overruling the agency.

If the Obama administration appeals Korman's ruling, it could re-ignite the simmering battle over women's reproductive health, which is never far from the surface in American politics. An appeal also could sidetrack the president just as he's trying to keep Congress and the public focused on gun control, immigration and resolving the nation's budget woes.

"There's no political advantage whatsoever," said Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf. "It's a side issue he doesn't need to deal with right now. The best idea is to leave it alone."

Still, Obama has made clear in the past that he feels strongly about the limits. As a politician whose name won't ever appear on a ballot again, it's hard to see the downside in sticking by his principles.

"As the father of two daughters, I think it is important for us to make sure that we apply some common sense to various rules when it comes to over-the-counter medicine," Obama said in 2011 when he endorsed Sebelius' decision.

The Justice Department said it is evaluating whether to appeal. Allison Price, a department spokeswoman, said there would be a prompt decision.

The White House said Obama's view on the issue hasn't changed since 2011.

"He supports that decision today. He believes it was the right common-sense approach to this issue," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

Appealing the decision could rile liberal groups and parts of Obama's political base that are already upset with his forthcoming budget, which includes cuts to programs like Medicare and Social Security.

But currying favor with conservatives who want the ruling to stand probably won't do much to help Obama make progress on his second-term priorities.

"It won't help him with Republicans in Congress to get policy matters attended to," Sheinkopf said.

Also weighing on Obama and his aides as he decides how to proceed is the unpleasant memory of previous dust-ups over contraception.

Among them is an election-year spat over an element of Obama's health care overhaul law that required most employers to cover birth control free of charge to female workers as a preventive service.

That controversy led to lawsuits that threatened to embroil Obama's health care law, already under fire for a requirement that individuals buy insurance, in even more legal action.

When Obama offered to soften the rule last year, religious groups said it wasn't enough. Obama proposed another compromise on the rule in February to mixed response from faith-based groups.

If the court order issued Friday stands, Plan B One-Step and its generic versions could move from behind pharmacy counters out to drugstore shelves. That would end a decade-plus struggle by women's groups for easier access to these pills, which can prevent pregnancy if taken soon enough after unprotected sex.

Women's health specialists hailed the ruling. They said there's no reason that a safe birth control option shouldn't be available over the counter and they dismissed concerns that it could encourage underage people to have sex.

But social conservatives, in a rare show of support for Obama's approach to social policy, said the ruling removes common-sense protections and denies parents and medical professionals the opportunity to be a safeguard for vulnerable young girls.

"The court's action undermines parents' ability to protect their daughters from such exploitation and from the adverse effects of the drug itself," Deirdre McQuade, spokeswoman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Half the nation's pregnancies every year are unintended. Doctors' groups say more access to morning-after pills, by putting them near the condoms and spermicides so people can learn about them and buy them quickly, could cut those numbers.

The morning-after pill contains a higher dose of the female progestin hormone than is in regular birth control pills. Taking it within 72 hours of rape, condom failure or just forgetting regular contraception can cut the chances of pregnancy by up to 89 percent.

It works best within the first 24 hours. If a woman already is pregnant, the pill has no effect.

Absent an appeal or a government request for more time to prepare one, the ruling will take effect in 30 days, meaning that over-the-counter sales could start then.

___

Associated Press writer Larry Neumeister in New York contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/risk-obama-pursuing-morning-pill-case-164412877--politics.html

randy travis arrested dickens greg kelly cujo karen handel hangout todd haley

Gerard Butler & Madalina Ghenea: Romance in Rome

Posted Saturday April 6, 2013 2:27 PM GMT

Enjoying some couple time in a romantic location, Gerard Butler and Madalina Ghenea were out and about in Rome on Friday (April 5).

Handsomely dressed in a fitted bluish grey suit, the sexy Scot and his lovely lady hit the town after the premiere of his new film ?Olympus Has Fallen.?

Recently, the 43-year old hunk opened up about his beautiful Romanian companion. ?I met her here in New York, and we hung out all night, didn?t even kiss, tried on my hat collection,? he explained. ?I said ?I?m coming to visit you in Milan,? and three days later, I was at her door in Milan. She was like, ?Whoa!??

When asked if Madalina could be ?the one,? Gerard smiled and replied, ?I?m having fun. I?m very lucky. She?s a great girl.?

Enjoy the pictures of Gerard Butler out with Madalina Ghenea in Rome, Italy (April 5).

Source: http://celebrity-gossip.net/gerard-butler/gerard-butler-madalina-ghenea-romance-rome-835292

cleveland news daytona race the cutting edge fox 8 news indy 500 angelina jolie leg daytona

Try out These Warm-Weather Foot Health Ideas ? Vegfest2011.org

With far more opportunities to feel the grass beneath feet and take barefoot walks over the sand, the milder months with the year can also be an excellent time for it to lavish a few extra care with your feet.

Over the warmer several weeks, people usually are reminded to guard and prepare your entire body knowning that includes the feet, which can be the almost all neglected area of the body.

Here are a few guidelines provided by the Us Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) to help you take care of this feet in addition to keep them in good shape for sandal period.

Apply On your own

Don?t forget to utilize sunscreen to your feet, especially for the tops and fronts associated with ankles. Be sure you reapply if you are in the lake.

Keep You Clean

Clean, dry feet resist condition. Make confident you bathe and dry the feet thoroughly, especially between toes, in addition to apply a new topical anti-fungal medication on almost any cracked or itchy skin tone.

Choose Comfort

Don?t jeopardize the fitness of your feet as you just identified the sandals ?you should own. ? These sandals may be trendy however your feet may pay for this determination.

Fortunately, shoe brands such as Aravon deliver superior comfort coupled with style within extensive sizing?s and widths, so you no longer have in order to suffer to seem great.

Protect The feet

Wear shoes which might be specific on the activity or perhaps sport you are parti-cipating within. Wear trainers when working or shoes when doing the job outside or even mowing the actual lawn. We have a time as well as place regarding sandals. The jogging track or maybe tennis court seriously isn?t one of them.

Finishing Feet Touches

Only employ nail polish if you have healthy fingernails. Nail enhance locks out and about moisture and doesn?t allow the nail or nail to take in air, so individuals who suffer through already jaded toenails will certainly aggravate their particular condition by not making it possible for their toenails to come in contact with air. Whatever the condition of your fingernails, remove toenail polish regularly.

Moisturize

To totally moisturize the feet, wrap all of them in cellophane right away. The cellophane acts like a makeshift spa, locking inside moisturizer. By morning your feet will become soothingly delicate.

Kick Your toes Up

A good day on the feet will make your feet swell. Give them a rest and slow up the swelling by means of sitting back and elevating your toes and legs towards the end of a lengthy day.

http://polindex.info/ | http://lomaranta.info/ | http://www.obxrealestate.info/

Source: http://www.vegfest2011.org/health-and-fitness/try-out-these-warm-weather-foot-health-ideas.html

nfldraft asante samuel salton sea arizona immigration law aubrey huff the killers julianne hough

Friday, April 5, 2013

A Political War Brews Over 'Food For Peace' Aid Program : Bay Area ...

Pakistani aid workers offload USAID food supplies from an Army helicopter in Kallam Valley during catastrophic flooding in 2010. Photo: Behrouz Mehri/AFP/Getty Images

Pakistani aid workers offload USAID food supplies from an Army helicopter in Kallam Valley during catastrophic flooding in 2010. Photo: Behrouz Mehri/AFP/Getty Images

Listen to the Story on Morning Edition

Play audio:
Audio player needs Flash9+ (download) and JavaScript.

Post by Dan Charles, The Salt at NPR Food (4/4/13)

Washington is awash in rumors this week that the White House is planning major changes in the way the U.S. donates food to fight hunger in some of the world?s poorest countries.

It has set off an emotional debate. Both sides say they are trying to save lives.

America?s policies on food aid are singularly generous ? and also unusually selfish. On the generous side, the U.S. spends roughly $1.5 billion every year to send food abroad, far more than any other country.

On the other hand, the rules for this program, known as Food for Peace, ensure that much of the money stays in American hands. Most of the food, which commonly includes wheat, corn and soy meal, and vegetable oil, has to be bought from U.S. farmers, processed here and delivered to its destination by U.S. shippers.

That eats up money and time. Andrew Natsios, who ran the U.S. Agency for International Development under President George W. Bush, says the results can be tragic. ?I?ve run these operations, and I know that food aid often gets there after everyone?s dead,? he says.

Sometimes food is available for sale much closer to the disaster, Natsios says. If U.S. food aid money could be used to buy that food, instead of shipping it from the U.S., it could save lives.

A decade ago, Natsios started a campaign to reform Food for Peace. He pushed for a change that would allow up to a quarter of the program?s budget to be distributed as cash that humanitarian groups could use to buy food wherever they needed it.

Among many of the groups that carry out food aid, Natsios? proposal did not go over well. When Natsios first announced it, at a meeting in Kansas City, he ?was almost physically assaulted,? he recalls.

It took a beating in Congress, too. It never got through the agriculture committees of Congress, which control the food aid budget.

In 2008, though, Natsios and the Bush administration were able to set up a couple of pilot programs that allow foreign purchases of food. Those programs now account for about a quarter of U.S. food aid, and according to independent reviews, they?re working pretty well.

According to the Washington rumor mill, the Obama administration now wants to go even further.

Gawain Kripke, policy director for Oxfam America, an anti-poverty activist group, says it?s an open secret that the White House is thinking of eliminating the current food aid program, which is funded through the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

A new food aid program within the U.S. Agency for International Development would take its place. This program would distribute cash that humanitarian groups could use to buy food where it is most needed.

The Obama effort to reform food aid ?looks like it will be more ambitious than what President Bush ever proposed, and more meaningful,? Kripke says.

According to Kripke, this could be a really good thing. ?We think the U.S. food aid program is quite broken and needs to be improved,? he says. ?It?s wasteful for taxpayers and doesn?t help nearly as many poor people as it could.?

But there?s already a wave of protest against it.

Leading the charge are some other humanitarian groups, such as International Relief and Development (IRD).

?We can?t figure out what?s going on,? says Jeffrey Grieco, IRD?s chief of public and government affairs.

There are a couple of reasons why these groups are upset. Some are worried that tampering with traditional food aid will lead to less funding because the agricultural lobby won?t support the program anymore.

But there?s another reason that?s less well-known. Some humanitarian groups ? including IRD ? rely on traditional food aid to help fund their work in Third World countries.

Here?s how.

Not all food aid goes to places suffering from famine. There?s also nonemergency food aid. When that food arrives, in a wide variety of countries, it?s turned over to nonprofit groups like IRD.

The way the system works, these groups sell that food on the local market and use the proceeds to pay for projects that help farmers or improve people?s nutrition.

IRD?s Grieco says this arrangement does a lot of good: ?The reason why these programs are important to us is because these programs are working, and we?re able to save lives.?

Critics, including Oxfam America, call it a horribly inefficient way to pay for local development projects. According to some calculations, at least a third of the money is wasted.

But Grieco says this system has been reliable. By law, all food aid funding has to be used to fight hunger. Any new cash program, he says, might end up paying for lots of other things, depending on shifting political fashions in Washington. ?If we remove the conditionalities about how the money should be spent, that money may never be available for those crises, at a key time when we need it,? he says.

Some of these fears are still, at the moment, fears of the unknown. The Obama administration is expected to release the actual details of its food aid proposal next week.

Copyright 2013 NPR.

Related posts

Tags: dan charles, food for peace, food policy, International Relief and Development, IRD, the salt, white house

Category: food banks, hunger, volunteer, NPR food, politics, activism, food safety, radio

Source: http://blogs.kqed.org/bayareabites/2013/04/04/a-political-war-brews-over-food-for-peace-aid-program/

barry sanders jr nick carter sister recruiting rankings san onofre paula deen birth control recall nick carter

Friday, March 29, 2013

University of Washington to Offer Its First Ever Online-Only Degree ...

I'm all for exploring innovative ways to extend affordable access to quality higher education, especially for students who find their vocation in low-paying (if much needed) professions. But I'm really not confident that online-only degrees are they way to go.

The University of Washington will offer a new low-cost online bachelor?s degree completion program in early childhood and family studies. Pending final approval, the program will start in the fall.

[...] The Early Childhood and Family Studies degree, which is the first online-only bachelor?s completion program to be offered by the UW, will prepare individuals to work in child care, preschools, social and mental health services, parent and family support, and arts organizations.

So, um, the UW's first ever online-only bachelor's degree will be granted in program training people in a profession that consists mostly of face-to-face interpersonal interaction? I mean, if distance learning is so magical, why train preschool teachers at all? Wouldn't it be cheaper and more effective to just hand all the toddlers iPads and let them teach themselves?

The UW online degree costs $160 per credit ? which is about equivalent to $7,000 for a year of full-time study ? regardless of where students live.

No doubt that's cheaper, sure. But in every sense of the word. And it's not just the students (and their students) who might not get the value out of this that they expect. If the UW is selling a degree for $7,000 a year (and with relaxed admission requirements), won't that devalue the degrees of students paying almost twice the price? Top schools like the UW stand to cheapen their brand if they're not careful.

The program will be administered by UW Educational Outreach, which received a Next Generation Learning Challenges grant partially funded by the Gates Foundation, to help offset costs of developing the degree. The grant includes offering several core classes in early childhood education free to the public, as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) on the Coursera platform.

What a great humanitarian Bill Gates is, promoting education reforms that in no way generate profits for the industry on which he built his fortune. (But then, all those libraries Andrew Carnegie built sure did use a lot of steel, so I guess I shouldn't be too cynical.)

I don't mean to come off as a Luddite. There's a place in higher education for online learning. But let's be clear: The main advantage of MOOCs is that they're cheaper. Not better, or for the most part, not even just as good. Just cheaper.

And if our public policy solution to the crisis in higher education funding is focused on making college cheaper, well, in the end, chances are we'll get what we pay for.

Source: http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/03/29/university-of-washington-to-offer-its-first-online-only-degree

titanic ii babe ruth new jersey nets nba playoff schedule rondo morris claiborne mothers day gifts

93% No

All Critics (86) | Top Critics (30) | Fresh (80) | Rotten (6)

"No" is a picture that perches precariously on the cusp of a paradox.

A cunning and richly enjoyable combination of high-stakes drama and media satire from Chilean director Pablo Larrain.

A mesmerizing, realistic and often hilarious look at the politics of power and the power of ideas ...

A political drama, a personal drama, a sharp-eyed study of how the media manipulate us from all sides, No reels and ricochets with emotional force.

It's a funny look at the way the media warp public opinion, and a curiously hopeful one.

On every level, "No" leaves one with bittersweet feelings about democracy, love and the cost of compromise.

A reflection of a moment in time, made in the image of that moment.

Bernal deftly explores the layers of the character's complexity, including his political apathy.

"No" is filmmaking of the first order.

Old technology plus the packaging of a revolution add up to a Yes

Freshens up a decades-old story with vibrant humor and a good sense of storytelling.

No continually impresses for its slyness and savvy -- rarely has such an eyesore been so worth watching.

Larrain fashions an unlikely crowd-pleaser from a historical episode that has its share of tragedy as well as triumph.

Stirring as a celebration of voter empowerment, No may also inspire pangs of wistful nostalgia.

Fascinating work from director Pablo Larrain and screenwriter Pedro Peirano, who manage to slip into the skin of a beleaguered country and detail the urgency of a revolution, sold one jingle at a time.

Swims upstream against high-definition with a defiantly lo-fi approach that's also ingeniously evocative of the historical period.

Wildly colorful strokes, full of bitter humor.

It's a fascinating and surprisingly fun look behind the scenes of politics and media.

No quotes approved yet for No. Logged in users can submit quotes.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/no_2012/

westboro baptist church Survivor Philippines Fashion Island shooting Victor Cruz nfl standings Vicki Soto Adam Lanza

What you missed from ?The Ultimate Fighter?

It was a fight-packed episode of "The Ultimate Fighter" as Tuesday night's episode had two fights and visits from two different champs.

Ronda Rousey stops by -- Kelvin won his first match, so he was rewarded with a visit with UFC women's bantamweight champion Ronda Rousey. It wasn't just for show, either, as Rousey showed Team Sonnen several judo techniques. She also pumped them up with some of her favorite "Momisms," including the choice line, "No one has the right to beat you."

Collin Hart (Team Jones) vs. Kelvin Gastellum (Team Sonnen)

Gastellum said in his pre-fight interviews that no one respects his boxing. Uh, they will now. Gastellum struck Hart quickly with a left hook that sent him down to the ground. Hart hit his head on the canvas, rolled over, and took a few more punches before the fight was stopped. It was a vicious, vicious knockout.

Mike Tyson! Oh, hey, no big deal. Mike Tyson showed up at the training center. He stopped in the locker rooms to say hello to the fighters.

Dylan Andrews (Team Jones) vs. Luke Barnatt (Team Sonnen)

A fight for the Queen as Australian Andrews takes on Brit Barnatt. Andrews got the takedown early in the first round, and Barnatt had no answer on the ground for much of the round. Andrews tried for a few chokes, but was unsuccessful.

Barnatt did a much better job in the second, creating offense from the bottom. This led to a third round, where Andrews took over. He knocked a clearly tired Barnatt around until he finally knocked him out in the third round.

Everyone was impressed with how Andrews fought through the third round, including the man signing the checks.

"I'm blown away and impressed with Dylan. That's how it's done here." ? Dana White

The next two quarterfinals are next week, and they'll have a tough act to follow.

College basketball video from Yahoo! Sports:

Other popular content on Yahoo! Sports:
? Pat Forde: Breaking down the Sweet 16
? Lakers' Metta World Peace has lateral meniscus tear in his knee
? David Shaw building Stanford into a perennial power
? Undefeated Gennady Golovkin could become boxing's next big thing

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mma-cagewriter/missed-ultimate-fighter-125847222--mma.html

Columbus Day 2012 carlina white Sam Champion Engaged Infield fly rule Taken 2 Venezuela Elections Skyfall